 |
Caitlin Clark gets a sample of WNBA defense against the Connecticut Sun. |
People that know me know that I have been involved in the promotion of girls' and women's basketball since the 1970s, not long after the Federal government made Title IX of the 1972 Educational Amendments the law of the land and established that expenditures for men's and women's athletics had to be equalized as a means of offering equal opportunity to women.
It could have happened sooner, in fact, but I was pretty much an arrogant ass when I was in high school. I had a job covering sports for the local weekly newspaper and I was going to all of the boys' games for free and making money and feeling really good about myself. And then one day, I was asked by my girlfriend (Jackie Cross, who was 5-foot-11, the starting center for the Mansfield High girls' team and a far better athlete than I could have ever hoped to be) why I never covered any of her games.
 |
Jackie Cross (left) in an exhibition game. |
"It's only girls' basketball," I said smugly, like she should understand and accept that she was inferior.
I don't mind telling you that the look of anger in her eyes is something that has stayed with me to this day -- and was also a motivating factor long after we parted company for me to change my ways.
When I entered my post-collegiate professional life, I still needed a few reminders of why it was important to start promoting equality for female athletes. But once I got on board, I never jumped off. And it has been one of the most rewarding decisions of my life.
It hasn't always been easy. A lot of male sports fans called me every derogatory name in the book, often questioning my sexual identity, because I wanted to get the girls' games into the paper along with the boys' games. There were even obstacles to overcome within the management structure of the newspaper, some members of which clung to old notions of male dominance in the sports world a lot longer than they should have. After all, we were welcoming another 50 percent of the population into the audience of a section previously deemed off-limits to them.
These days, those arguments are heard a lot less -- but there are still walls of resistance that say women's college and professional basketball are inferior products.
And then came a woman from Des Moines, Iowa, named Caitlin Clark -- and suddenly, huge cracks have appeared in those walls.
 |
Caitlin Clark became a sensation. |
Clark is a 6-foot gym rat who, in case you've been residing under a rock for the last four years, shattered all the NCAA Division I scoring records for the University of Iowa and became the No. 1 overall draft pick in the WNBA. Along the way, she started filling arenas everywhere she went and raised interest in the women's college game to levels it hasn't even come close to over the previous half-century.
And that pissed a lot of people off.
It pissed off the old guard of misogynists that still believe, as the Kansas City Chiefs' placekicker, Harrison Butker says, that women should be barefoot, pregnant and in the kitchen.
It pissed off a lot of Black athletes already in the WNBA, who claimed that the only reason why America was going gaga for Caitlin Clark is because she's the great white hope.
It pissed off players like former LSU star Angel Reese (drafted by Chicago) and teams like the University of South Carolina. They have championship rings and Clark doesn't, but she's white, haven't you heard?
It pissed off even some of the old-guard white girls in the WNBA, most notably former UConn star Diana Taurasi, who is one of the best women's players in history and yet, in an alternate broadcast of the NCAA title game hosted by her and fellow UConn and WNBA great Sue Bird, made a point that Clark would be in for a rude awakening when she started playing the veteran athletes in the pros on a regular basis. It wasn't an invalid statement, but it did come off as a little mean-spirited by Taurasi, who makes no apologies for having an element of "punk" in her persona.
And I won't even get into the social media debates by people that probably never watched a minute of women's basketball in their lifetimes until this past year. The word "newbies" wasn't coined just for them, but it should have been.
Anyway, Clark played her first regular-season WNBA game last night for the Indiana Fever, right nearby in Uncasville, Conn., against the Connecticut Sun. And in case you're that clueless about the WNBA, the Sun is about the closest thing that Boston can claim to having a franchise. Yes, the city that has 17 NBA championships in its back pocket has never lifted a single finger to play host to a WNBA franchise.
It wasn't the happiest of career openers for Ms. Clark. Connecticut won the game, 92-71. She finished with 20 points (many in what we'd call "garbage time" when the outcome was all-but certain), but had 10 turnovers (a WNBA record for a player's first game) and just 3 assists. She shot 5-15 from the field overall and was 4-11 from three-point land.
I watched most of it. It wasn't hard to tell at the start of the game that Clark was pressing to make things happen, but she was writing checks that her teammates couldn't cash. She tried her signature no-look drop passes and eye-of-the-needle bullets into the paint, but most of her 10 turnovers were the result of her new teammates being unprepared or unable to handle Clark's feeds.
And she was being hammered. Connecticut played her physically -- sometimes way too physically -- but that's how the pro women's game has evolved and Clark is just going to have to get used to it.
The bottom line is that it was one game, the first of her career. There's not enough data to make any sort of judgment. But that didn't stop a lot of the Great Unwashed from having their say.
The misogynists said she was a flop and that the league still sucks and we'd all be better off watching reruns of "The A-Team" instead of the WNBA.
The folks that claim Clark's popularity is based in racism were gleeful that Whitey White Girl had her come-uppance in the opener.
The Diana Taurasi acolytes claim that the world owes their heroine apologies for accurately pointing out that Clark would be humbled by veteran ballplayers.
And so on, and so on, and so on.
Look, as I said, it's only one game. I've come away with some obvious conclusions -- first, that Indiana is not a very good team, which is why they've had the No. 1 draft pick two years in a row. Connecticut, one of the best defensive teams in the W, was fundamentally stronger at almost every position and every needed skill, and the results bore that out.
Second, it may require some adaptations on the part of the Indiana coaching staff to let Clark be Clark -- moving, creating, taking the big threes -- until her teammates get on the same page with her. I've seen a lot of basketball in the past 60 years and I fully believe that some of what Clark can do with the ball is other-worldly. But the talent level is higher and while I fully expect Clark to adapt, it still behooves her coaches to not break her spirit during that adaptation period. Let Caitlin create.
And finally, it cannot be denied that Clark has brought the game to the masses. The arena at Mohegan Sun was banged out, with 8,910 tickets sold, an all-time record for the Sun franchise. The game also pulled in a TV rating of 2.12 million viewers on ESPN2, which beat the Bruins-Panthers playoff game (2.0 million) that was showing on ESPN. And in the past several weeks, many WNBA franchises have switched games to larger arenas within their host cities to accommodate ticket demand.
Will this evaporate if Clark doesn't instantly become the greatest thing since sliced bread? That's entirely possible. A lot also depends on what college ball presents in the post-Clark era -- and for my money, I'm hoping that UConn's Paige Bueckers has a tremendous and injury-free final year to keep the momentum of the women's game building, because before her knees betrayed her, Paige Buckets was Caitlin Clark before there was a Caitlin Clark.
In the meantime, the WNBA is talking expansion. San Francisco and Toronto are already on board, and the league has revealed that NBA cities Philadelphia, Portland, Denver and Miami are under consideration, as well as non-affiliated Nashville.
But where is Boston?
One of the most liberal cities in the nation, a bastion of the women's movement and the capital of a state which has a female governor and a female U.S. Senator, does not have a WNBA franchise. And that's ridiculous.
That's why I've been saying for some time now that if Celtics' owner Wyc Grousbeck doesn't want to get on board with the future, perhaps the richest Boston team owner should. Patriots' owner Robert Kraft is worth $11 billion according to the latest list of American billionaires compiled by Forbes Magazine, and his NFL investment basically takes care of itself no matter how bad the team is. The Revolution soccer team is nothing more than an afterthought in the Kraft empire, or else they would have already built a soccer-specific stadium somewhere and spent ungodly sums to bring championships to the Revs' tiny fan base.
 |
Kraft can do better things with his time. |
Almost every year around April (well, four times since 2018), Kraft has welcomed the girls' basketball team from Foxboro High School to look at his trophies and take the same tour of the stadium to honor the state championships the Warriors have won. It's almost old hat. But if Kraft, now 82, wants to add positively to his legacy, maybe he should seize upon the moment and spend some of that $11 billion to bring the WNBA to Boston.
It's not a huge investment -- other than rent at the TD Garden, the players get ridiculously small salaries and there are only 13 or 14 of them. It's also a short season at a time of year where there's little else going on other than the disappointing Red Sox. Above all else, it might help Kraft buy back some of the good will among women that he may have lost as a result of his embarrassing dalliances at that massage parlor that Tom Brady doesn't want me to joke about.
C'mon, Bob. You know you can't take it with you. And Jonathan is just going to mess everything up anyway. Do something good for the female athletes of the region that are begging for opportunities.
Odds and Ends: A few related thoughts to end this diatribe.
* Old friend Sarah Behn has a new job, and it's back in high school coaching.
 |
Foxboro's Sarah Behn. |
The one-time leading scorer in the history of Massachusetts girls' basketball (2,562 points at Foxboro, another 2,523 points at Boston College) has accepted the top girls' job at Archbishop Williams High School in Braintree.
Behn has been inactive in the coaching ranks since leaving Brown University in 2020, but she hasn't been out of the game, running an AAU program and giving instruction at her new camps. She coached in the past at North Attleboro High, Framingham State, Franklin Pierce, Franklin High, Foxboro High, UMass-Lowell and Brown.
Archbishop Williams, formerly a terror in MIAA Division 3, has been enduring hard times lately. Last year, D1 state champ Bishop Feehan got out to a 27-2 lead in the first quarter of one of its two Catholic Central League games against the Bishops (don't call them the Archies!). So it's clear that Behn will have her work cut out for her.
Best of luck to the best high school athlete I every covered, in any sport.
* My best argument for WNBA expansion may be the plight of a former local standout, Lauren Manis of Franklin, who starred for four seasons at Bishop Feehan and went on to become the only Holy Cross basketball player of either gender to score more than 2,000 career points and grab more than 1,000 rebounds.
 |
Feehan's Lauren Manis |
Upon graduating from Holy Cross, Manis became a draft pick of the Las Vegas Aces in 2020. She was released by the Aces in training camp, and went on to play professionally overseas. She had another shot with the Aces in a subsequent camp and drew interest from the Seattle Storm, but in each instance, she was released and returned to the international circuit.
Manis, a 6-1 forward with a great long-range shot, has played in Belgium, Hungary, Israel, Greece and is currently in her second tour of duty with the Halcones team based in Xalapa, Mexico. At every stop she has been a double-figure scorer and rebounder, and she clearly has the skills to play at the next level. But there are a lot of even more talented athletes in the WNBA and not enough teams or roster spots available.
With two more teams coming on board in short order and a third very likely soon after, maybe there's hope that Manis, who'll be 26 on May 29 and is in the prime of her career, may have a shot to finally get to the W.
See you all soon with another post and podcasts as well.
Mark Farinella has covered women's basketball at the high school and college level since 1977. Contact him at theownersbox2020@gmail.com.